It does mention breach of contract several times. but not what contract... perhaps they're trying to imply a contract/rely on oral contract? does anyone know i

It does mention breach of contract several times. but not what contract... perhaps they're trying to imply a contract/rely on oral contract? does anyone know if there's precedent showing how a court would react to the publication of letters and emails concerning a legal rift and running up to proceedings - will courts look favourably on that at all?