It seems like one of those silly things that happen when a bored drone in a bureaucracy blindly applies rules passed down from on high. I would expect a decisio

It seems like one of those silly things that happen when a bored drone in a bureaucracy blindly applies rules passed down from on high. I would expect a decision reversal pretty soon. This is clearly a bug in Apple's internal policy stemming from an edge-case that wasn't considered while drafting it. Or whoever made the banning decision didn't closely read the "Exceptions to this rule" part of the policy (if it exists)