So you're suggesting they're correct but can't explain their point of view with basic facts/information/references/logic? No, I am not. Let's look at my words

So you're suggesting they're correct but can't explain their point of view with basic facts/information/references/logic? No, I am not. Let's look at my words again. "The people who know what they're talking about say it once, coherently and concisely." I thought that was pretty clear. They can explain their point of view. They explain it coherently and concisely. What about that equates to "can't explain"? Are you measuring correctness by how long someone takes to explain it? That.. doesn't sound likely. Of course it doesn't. That's not what I said. Not at all. I genuinely have no idea how you ended up thinking that's what I said, but I'm starting to understand why you're in favour of the loud-mouthed Dunning-Kruger victims.