3 ms·
Perhaps this should be understood as "You already know, or have been/will be convinced by the rest of this article, that in the current world, life for the bott
by Chinjut 11y ago
Perhaps this should be understood as "You already know, or have been/will be convinced by the rest of this article, that in the current world, life for the bottom quintile of Americans is not great. To give some sense of perspective on just how many people suffer from the problems currently afflicting the bottom quintile, that's a full 64 million people whose lives are not great."?
- ryusage 11y agoI agree. As posted here, out of context, it sounds silly. But in context: "For those in the bottom quintile, household income in inflation-adjusted dollars has dropped sharply, from $13,787 in 2000 to $11,651 in 2013. According to the Census Bureau, 64 million Americans currently live in the bottom quintile." Seems like a perfectly reasonable statement.
- friism 11y agoYou're right, but still funny that the author feels the need to invoke the Census Bureau to back up that piece of arithmetic.
- mikeash 11y agoIt's strange wording. It would be a lot smoother stated like, "According to the Census Bureau, there are currently 320 million Americans, which means that 64 million live in the bottom quintile." They ultimately mean the same, but one version takes a lot more effort to decode.