4 ms·
I have basicaly been running this "experiment" for the last 20 years. It began with (e.g., text-only) browsers that do not source content from other domains au
by ised 11y ago
I have basicaly been running this "experiment" for the last 20 years. It began with (e.g., text-only) browsers that do not source content from other domains automatically, then I started blocking ads via DNS in response to today's "locked-down" computers like smartphones. I just do not see ads. I often need not even visit a webpage. I just download the content I want, directly, using a custom filter.
Do long load times, visual distractions and page clutter matter?
I posit only when you are accustomed to _not_ experiencing these things.
For me, it is difficult to voluntarily choose 38 connections (how many DNS lookups is that?) and 11 second load times after experiencing 2 second load time and connection to one IP only.
I still find it shocking how many connections today's "average" webpages make to third party domains. It was not always this way. I doubt it would have been feasible with yesterday's bandwidth and memory. Somehow things ramped up to the point of absurdity and it's as if no one noticed.
If there is a "moral dilemma" it should amongst with the ad/tracking folks.
- niutech 11y agoYeah, I have been using HOSTS file adblocker for years and it performs better than AdBlock Plus. On iOS, you can set your own controlled DNS server with a blacklist of ad servers.