3 ms·

I must have missed the part in the article where Arrington says why I should care about this publicity stunt.

• rjurney 17y ago
  The novelty is that Arrington often documents the failures of others, but is now documenting a failure of his own.
• jeremymims 17y ago
  I think we've passed the point for publicity stunt speculation. There's enough blood spilled that this couldn't have been the intent.
  • cmelbye 17y ago
    Fair enough. Replace "publicity stunt" with "drama". Stuff being leaked and shady things happening are not new things to happen on TechCrunch by any means.
  • gojomo 17y ago
    So far there is only ink spilled -- not blood. ('Blood' would in this case be large legal fees or judgments.)
  • bumblebird 17y ago
    It's certainly an effective way to get people to link/come to Techcrunch.