3 ms·
Something's sketchy. Wouldn't the TechCrunch lawyer have referred to a contract covering their partnership arrangement? The letter by the lawyer is pure scare t
by 9oliYQjP 17y ago
Something's sketchy. Wouldn't the TechCrunch lawyer have referred to a contract covering their partnership arrangement? The letter by the lawyer is pure scare tactics. It does not point to any specific violation of a written contract anywhere. Was there even a Letter of Intent signed by TechCrunch and these folks? If not, that's just amateur hour over there.
- rjurney 17y agoYeah, is this how getting hardware built works?
- dgallagher 17y agoYou raise a very good question. Was there a legally binding contract/agreement between both parties, or was it done "on a handshake" without really having a solid legal backing?
- flipbrad 17y agoIt does mention breach of contract several times. but not what contract... perhaps they're trying to imply a contract/rely on oral contract? does anyone know if there's precedent showing how a court would react to the publication of letters and emails concerning a legal rift and running up to proceedings - will courts look favourably on that at all?
- Herring 17y agoYeah a few people on the blog are wondering the same thing. But I don't see how that would make Fusion Garage look good. Unless you think they're both making it up for PR.
- amix 17y agoGiven that Michael Arrington was a lawyer it would surprise me a lot if they don't have any contracts.
- mmt 17y agothat's just amateur hour over there Maybe not for FG, but I think we can comfortably characterize TC as being amateur in the hardware arena. Has Arrington ever run a business whose product end users paid for?