I'm not a lawyer but is it not possible that if a lawsuit proceeds, TechCrunch's own inaccurate, often speculative, bordering on drama queen news posts could wo

I'm not a lawyer but is it not possible that if a lawsuit proceeds, TechCrunch's own inaccurate, often speculative, bordering on drama queen news posts could work against them? A lawyer could paint TechCrunch as the kind of entity that blows everything out of proportion, including their involvement in this project. Surely the lawyer could dig up some TechCrunch stories spewing inaccurate rumours and speculation as proof. Seeing as how it would be a civil case, this sort of evidence could surely be brought up could it not?