4 ms·
But... wait... Don't tell me they've never tested it! I mean with or near real explosives, etc. Regardless... the responsible should be charged with murder.
by yawz 11y ago
But... wait... Don't tell me they've never tested it! I mean with or near real explosives, etc.
Regardless... the responsible should be charged with murder.
- mfoy_ 11y agoThe article addressed both of your points. The people in charge of "testing" the device before approving the purchase were probably getting kickbacks. The prosecution opted to go for fraud over corporate manslaughter because the former was much easier to prove.