Audio: http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2014/14-275 http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2014/14-275 mp3: http://www.supremecourt.g

Audio: http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2014/14-275 http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2014/14-275 mp3: http://www.supremecourt.gov/media/audio/mp3files/14-275.mp3 http://www.supremecourt.gov/media/audio/mp3files/14-275.mp3 @ about 17:30 a discussion begins about the difference between taking records and taking other things. The defendant's lawyer argued that taking the raisins is a taking of property and taking records (in most cases) is not. He kinda had to argue that because he was pressed. Maybe it's a positive sign that the court was asking about it in the context of this decision. If nothing else, the intrinsic privacy of information in itself has value. The prosecution crashes and burns off the line @ 25:00 the wreck continues, 48:18 ha.