4 ms·
Not countering your central point really but I'd note that the distribution is pretty skewed[1], i.e. the 300k+ group is a plurality in some neighborhoods. [1]
by skorgu 17y ago
Not countering your central point really but I'd note that the distribution is pretty skewed[1], i.e. the 300k+ group is a plurality in some neighborhoods.
[1] http://envisioningdevelopment.net/map http://envisioningdevelopment.net/map
- josefresco 17y agoI used the same source as you. Irregardless of the data my point was that 1.1 mil in income is a lot, no matter where you live in the world.
- wlievens 17y agoUpvoted you for a reasonable point. But I want to subtract half a karma vote for the use of Irregardless. Shame!