4 ms·
If you pay for office, you should get Office... that pretty much sums it up for me. And perhaps everyone who uses Office won't use Android as their primary cont
by ytdht 11y ago
If you pay for office, you should get Office... that pretty much sums it up for me. And perhaps everyone who uses Office won't use Android as their primary content creation device... but I might be wrong.
- VieElm 11y agoMicrosoft is obligated to its stakeholders (investors and employees) to capture all the value it can for the products it creates. They're not building software out of goodwill. You do have the choice to not buy Office if you don't like the pricing scheme.
- ytdht 11y agoyou do, but is it the most profitable option for Microsoft is my point
- scholia 11y agoIt could fill it with adverts and track you, which is how Google pays for its "free" stuff. Or it could attach it to $1,500 hardware dongles, like Apple. The Microsoft ecosystem is much more powerful, and works both online and offline, and it's cross-platform (Windows, Android, iOS), but you don't think any of this is worth paying for? Perhaps you have much more important things to spend your money on. How much is your smartphone costing you? How much do you spend on Spotify, or Starbucks? How much would you have to pay Google for the 50GB mailbox and 1TB of storage bundled with Office 365?
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- balls187 11y agoYou pay a one-time fee, you typically get a license to use that software on One Computer. The benefit of subscriptions is that they typically are more generous with allowing you to use their services on multiple devices (perhaps not simultaneously). I would say it's similar to saying "I bought Star Wars on VHS, therefor I should get he HD version for free"
- ytdht 11y agoThe Android version is inferior to the Microsoft PC version .... so if you pay a one-time fee for the HD version, the SD version should definitely be free