5 ms·
The article claims $200,000 in punitive damages... which means the claim was $300,000 in actual damages? It's hard to imagine what damages the patient suffered
by rfrey 11y ago
The article claims $200,000 in punitive damages... which means the claim was $300,000 in actual damages? It's hard to imagine what damages the patient suffered besides embarrassment.
It seems very pat. It sounds like everyone in the theatre was ripping into the guy, which suggests a backstory in pre-op. And then the recorder was accidentally left on.
I wasn't in the room, obviously, and there's probably much more information that influenced the jury. But still, weird.
Edit: the recorder wasn't "accidentally" left on, the patient turned it on before the operation to capture post-op instructions.
- russelluresti 11y agoThis sounds like more of a case where the money awarded wasn't to compensate the plaintiff for any physical harm, but to punish the doctors. Which, to me, is just fine.
- plorkyeran 11y agoThat's the $200k in punitive damages part. The other $300k is compensation for harm.