Of course not. What I question is that the increase in the average land-ocean temperature has a causal and unique relationship with the increase in the amount

Of course not. What I question is that the increase in the average land-ocean temperature has a causal and unique relationship with the increase in the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. And I question this based only in the charts and information presented here. >>> The computer model that generated the results for this graphic is called "ModelE2," and was created by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), which has been a leader in climate projections for a generation. - Is ModelE2 completely foolproof ? >>> ModelE2 contains something on the order of 500,000 lines of code, and is run on a supercomputer at the NASA Center for Climate Simulation in Greenbelt, Maryland. - How many bugs could you find in 500.000 lines of code ? The "Excel depression" article came to my mind after seeing this [1] Again, I am not negating the global warning issue, but I am for critical thinking for these fundamental problems. [1] http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/19/opinion/krugman-the-excel-depression.html?_r=0 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/19/opinion/krugman-the-excel-...