5 ms·
You're out of step and, yourself, out of line. https://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=326 https://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=326 The name chan
by pistle 11y ago
You're out of step and, yourself, out of line.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=326 https://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=326
The name change agenda is most often liked to a Republican strategist based on focus groups saying CC was LESS scary than GW.
- EdSharkey 11y agoI was pointing out how the parent sounded like a creep with his groupthink shaming routine. What a bore. You can spin what I said with some "republicans are evil" noise, but my original point stands. As for you, don't be so religious. Your "out of step" crack makes you sound like a creep too.
- pistle 11y agoGood on you if you don't have time to read the link, but your point doesn't stand if you took a minute to read the linked article. Remaining blissfully, self-righteously uninformed in your name-calling (shaming) routine has no quarter here.
- EdSharkey 11y agoYou have somehow contrived that I disagree with you on evil republicans and their wicked focus group-driven shifting of the public conversation! It's a common wickedness in politics that all sides employ that I find distasteful. I just don't find the bone you're picking here apropos to what I actually said. Sorry I don't feel like playing your emotional appeal to logic game today. Zzzzz. Your strident insistence now that we somehow disagree on your made-up issue is creeping me out even more. You're projecting, I guess? If you'd take a sec to do a little self-reflection, you'd see something is wrong with your thought process or how you address others or something. That you can't just confront the creep/groupthink/fascist natures of you and the parent head-on is predictable, but troublesome. Either accept what I said or contest it, don't try to change the subject, it's lazy.