5 ms·
I'm curious. Gravity has not been proven to attract two masses, for instance?
by tosseraccount 11y ago
I'm curious.
Gravity has not been proven to attract two masses, for instance?
- tosseraccount 11y agoIs there any evidence that two masses don't attract ?
- bildung 11y ago> Is there any evidence that two masses don't attract ? The answer to that question does not in any way proof the existence of gravity. I don't mean to offend, but if you honestly ask these types of questions, I doubt you are able to evaluate the quality of original papers dealing with climate research.
- tosseraccount 11y agoYou're making an adhominem argument. Have there been times when earth temperature change was not anthropogenic?
- vectorjohn 11y agopointing out that you don't understand a basic concept is not an ad hominem. It's just true, and is an important detail.
- akssri 11y agoIf your theory is just "two masses attract", then your theory would be far more accurately 'verified' than Newton's laws of gravity, but also far less useful. Newton's laws are superceded by General relativity.
- gnaritas 11y agoAs he already said, science doesn't do proofs; proof is something for Math, science does evidence, nothing is ever proven. Asking a scientist for proof merely shows you don't know what science is and thus aren't capable of using it to make decisions.
- bildung 11y ago> I'm curious. Gravity has not been proven to attract two masses, for instance? Correct. That's why it's called the theory of gravity :) You would need Laplace's demon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace's_demon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace's_demon) for a proof. "Proof" means absolute certainty. You only find that in math, not in the physical world.