The idea of a "trickle-down illusion" really struck a chord for me: > Software developers often buy into the idea of advancement by individual merit--either th

The idea of a "trickle-down illusion" really struck a chord for me: > Software developers often buy into the idea of advancement by individual merit--either through a liberal lens in which meritocracy is an ideal we still need to work toward, or a libertarian one in which everyone is already where they deserve to be, top or bottom. And: > In this context, it's easy for those who believe they are being mistreated to feel isolated and even personally inadequate, rather than seeking solidarity from co-workers. Software development, like other skilled trades, is a place where a worker can use her personal qualities (ie training, experience, interest) to create something of value and have a sense of pride about it. Combined with the notion, as stated in this essay, of an individualistic "garage-to-riches" outcome for dedicated and/or brilliant developers, it's not hard to picture a culture that characterizes the boss more as a peer than as a regulating influence, personal affability notwithstanding. This characterization can undermine a developer's consideration of themselves as, well, a worker, with all of the associated social and historical implications. Anyways, thanks for the post, I always appreciate well-thought articles that cast the software industry in a broader perspective.