7 ms·

Tut, tut. You are right of course, but you are still out of line here. Let me remind you in no uncertain terms that the correct meme is now 'climate change'.

Tut, tut. You are right of course, but you are still out of line here. Let me remind you in no uncertain terms that the correct meme is now 'climate change'. To say 'global warming' confirms that the models predict warming. Of course, the models still DO continue to predict warming, however recent climate data suggests we are in a cooling phase. We must be vigilant to maintain our thought controls in order to remain part of the group. You will accept that the science predicts warming in a world that is currently cooling. And to confirm to the group that you accept this contradiction, you must force yourself to always use the proper meme in your speech. Thanks in advance, The Group

pistle 11y ago
You're out of step and, yourself, out of line. https://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=326 https://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=326 The name change agenda is most often liked to a Republican strategist based on focus groups saying CC was LESS scary than GW.
- EdSharkey 11y ago
  I was pointing out how the parent sounded like a creep with his groupthink shaming routine. What a bore. You can spin what I said with some "republicans are evil" noise, but my original point stands. As for you, don't be so religious. Your "out of step" crack makes you sound like a creep too.
  - pistle 11y ago
    Good on you if you don't have time to read the link, but your point doesn't stand if you took a minute to read the linked article. Remaining blissfully, self-righteously uninformed in your name-calling (shaming) routine has no quarter here.
    - EdSharkey 11y ago
      You have somehow contrived that I disagree with you on evil republicans and their wicked focus group-driven shifting of the public conversation! It's a common wickedness in politics that all sides employ that I find distasteful. I just don't find the bone you're picking here apropos to what I actually said. Sorry I don't feel like playing your emotional appeal to logic game today. Zzzzz. Your strident insistence now that we somehow disagree on your made-up issue is creeping me out even more. You're projecting, I guess? If you'd take a sec to do a little self-reflection, you'd see something is wrong with your thought process or how you address others or something. That you can't just confront the creep/groupthink/fascist natures of you and the parent head-on is predictable, but troublesome. Either accept what I said or contest it, don't try to change the subject, it's lazy.

pistle 11y ago

You're out of step and, yourself, out of line. https://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=326 https://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=326 The name change agenda is most often liked to a Republican strategist based on focus groups saying CC was LESS scary than GW.

EdSharkey 11y ago
I was pointing out how the parent sounded like a creep with his groupthink shaming routine. What a bore. You can spin what I said with some "republicans are evil" noise, but my original point stands. As for you, don't be so religious. Your "out of step" crack makes you sound like a creep too.
- pistle 11y ago
  Good on you if you don't have time to read the link, but your point doesn't stand if you took a minute to read the linked article. Remaining blissfully, self-righteously uninformed in your name-calling (shaming) routine has no quarter here.
  - EdSharkey 11y ago
    You have somehow contrived that I disagree with you on evil republicans and their wicked focus group-driven shifting of the public conversation! It's a common wickedness in politics that all sides employ that I find distasteful. I just don't find the bone you're picking here apropos to what I actually said. Sorry I don't feel like playing your emotional appeal to logic game today. Zzzzz. Your strident insistence now that we somehow disagree on your made-up issue is creeping me out even more. You're projecting, I guess? If you'd take a sec to do a little self-reflection, you'd see something is wrong with your thought process or how you address others or something. That you can't just confront the creep/groupthink/fascist natures of you and the parent head-on is predictable, but troublesome. Either accept what I said or contest it, don't try to change the subject, it's lazy.