3 ms·
> it doesn't prove one way or another whether the cause of the rise in greenhouse gasses is manmade. Does anyone seriously doubt that rises in CO2 are not prin
by Brakenshire 11y ago
> it doesn't prove one way or another whether the cause of the rise in greenhouse gasses is manmade.
Does anyone seriously doubt that rises in CO2 are not principally driven by human activity? I have never even seen that as a talking point.
- curiousgeorgio 11y agoDoes the popularity of a doubt or idea even matter here when we're supposed to be discussing science?
- 7Z7 11y agoBrakenshire didn't question the popularity of the topic, rather whether it had been convincingly postulated by anyone worth mentioning.
- jonknee 11y agoSure. Michelle Bachmann believes lots of crazy things: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAaDVOd2sRQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAaDVOd2sRQ > And yet were being told that we have to reduce this natural substance and reduce the American standard of living to create an arbitrary reduction in something that is naturally occurring in the earth. Well were told the crux of this problem is human activity. Its humans that are creating more carbon dioxide! > What part of human activity creates carbon dioxide? If carbon dioxide is a negligible gas and its only three percent of Earths atmosphere, what part is human activity?