3 ms·
Isn't eye witness testimony even more dubious? It's possible the jury wouldn't have convicted him on eye witness testimony alone, but the fact that the physica
by saint_fiasco 11y ago
Isn't eye witness testimony even more dubious?
It's possible the jury wouldn't have convicted him on eye witness testimony alone, but the fact that the physical "scientific" evidence agreed made it seem more legitimate.
- rayiner 11y agoEye witness testimony, especially for cross-racial identification, is very dubious: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-race_effect#Cross-race_identification_bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-race_effect#Cross-race_i...