4 ms·
This sounds like a great use of taxpayer money. $30M is chump change compared to the upgrade cost, and as I've grown older I've developed a reverence for workin
by idlewords 11y ago
This sounds like a great use of taxpayer money. $30M is chump change compared to the upgrade cost, and as I've grown older I've developed a reverence for working code and working systems.
- a3n 11y ago> $30M is chump change compared to the upgrade cost Which said upgrade is going to happen anyway, so it's not staying fees vs upgrade cost, it's staying fees (however long it's dragged out) plus upgrade cost. The proper comparison is $30M vs the cost of not doing "business".