Indeed. This sounds like they just gathered soundbites from his opponents without any attempt at even-handedness, even though many of the issues have been follo

Indeed. This sounds like they just gathered soundbites from his opponents without any attempt at even-handedness, even though many of the issues have been followed by a lot of back-and-forth in public fora. Followers of Krugman's blog can recognise many counterarguments in the article which have been specifically addressed in his blog (and in many cases credibly overturned). Also it would be fair to let his side pick a share of the debate points.