24 ms·
Wow, someone doesn't like movies very much. "But the dismaying fact remains that the majority of art-house cinema treats science fiction as a means to acquire
by erroneousfunk 11y ago
Wow, someone doesn't like movies very much.
"But the dismaying fact remains that the majority of art-house cinema treats science fiction as a means to acquire a veneer of philosophical gravitas, while freeing the auteur from the burden of writing a story that makes the slightest bit of sense."
Science Fiction aside, you could say much the same thing about "Groundhog Day," "It's a Wonderful Life," and "Pan's Labyrinth." Any movie with a bit of "magical thinking" and "what if..." That's the whole point of huge swaths of movies from every category of cinema! Even romance and drama -- with seemingly solid footing in reality draws on the implausible to make things interesting. You really think a successful Richard Gere would fall head over heels in love with a prostitute (even one who looks like Julia Roberts)?
If you want "science" why are you looking in "science fiction"?
- k__ 11y agoMaybe because Groundhog Day is just totally crazy and Her ... just a bit. The smaller the mistakes, the more they seem like laziness. In Groundhog Day it seems like a constructed thing and the main plot that the protagonist lives one day again and again. In Her it seems like a side-note, that a company is selling their super AI for way to much money to do things that don't need an AI in the first place. If you want to use such things in your design/composition you have to embrace them and don't do them half-assed. Ex-Machina had much better premises, but the actors were really bad and the story didn't play with these premises very well.