3 ms·
I did not see the movie. But without rivers the mountains would still be a better option then ground level land: cooler and rainy because of the height.
by Gys 11y ago
I did not see the movie. But without rivers the mountains would still be a better option then ground level land: cooler and rainy because of the height.
- saiya-jin 11y agowell, movie (heck, all MM movies took place in Australia, which is anything but mountainous land. and it goes on - if rivers are poisoned, rain is some sort of hardcore acid pouring down. you actually want to avoid that as much as possible. so no, even for people that would be able to travel far, mountains might be a worse choice. plus, they are so deep into apocalypse, that they don't know geography beyond what they can reach by cars
- eru 11y agoWe have mountains in Australia, too.