4 ms·
Source for that bit about "statements already made about blocking porn"? Surely no politician would be stupid enough to ever think blocking porn is a good idea
by 9762384 11y ago
Source for that bit about "statements already made about blocking porn"? Surely no politician would be stupid enough to ever think blocking porn is a good idea.
- sdrothrock 11y ago> Surely no politician would be stupid enough to ever think blocking porn is a good idea. It's not a new idea at all. Here's a separate example. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/03/david-cameron-internet-porn-filter-censorship-creep http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/03/david-c...
- PebblesHD 11y agoFred Nile - Head of the Australian Christian Lobby. The wording of the new laws is so open that purpose creep is almost intended.
- windowsworkstoo 11y agoJust a nit, but Nile isn't the head of the ACL, which is a lobby group - he is the head of the Christian Democratic Party.
- PebblesHD 11y agoQuite right, They seem to be almost interchangeable these days
- darylteo 11y ago"But think of the children"
- JupiterMoon 11y ago> Surely no politician would be stupid enough to ever think blocking porn is a good idea. You really really need to read a little more mainstream media (with a sceptical eye obviously). In the UK this has been debated for years now - and when one gets a new internet connection one has to (theoretically) decide whether to opt in or opt out of porn.