2 ms·
Which is the point, when he's says it's not UNIX'y, he means it doesn't play well with the environment; he's not talking about philosophy, he's talking about th
by gnaritas 11y ago
Which is the point, when he's says it's not UNIX'y, he means it doesn't play well with the environment; he's not talking about philosophy, he's talking about the implementation so saying it's philosophically the same is missing the point.
- girvo 11y agoMy point is that the original article was saying its "UNIX'y" in philosophy. So the commenter you're discussing is the one who is missing the point, in my opinion. It's a moot point anyway, we're being needlessly pedantic here.