3 ms·
Given that kdbus support was merged[1] in mainline systemd, I feel the situation is one of "I see you're not merging my friend's patches... would be a shame if
by anon4 11y ago
Given that kdbus support was merged[1] in mainline systemd, I feel the situation is one of "I see you're not merging my friend's patches... would be a shame if the only remaining implementation of init would support only slow-dbus or kdbus..."
[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-June/033170.html http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-Jun...
- comex 11y agosystemd has been using slow-dbus, via libdbus, for who knows how long. Now it will use slow-dbus via sd-bus. Hard to imagine how that could possibly amount to a threat.
- vezzy-fnord 11y agoThey've actually been using sd-bus for about two years now. What's new is that kdbus support is now build-time mandatory.