4 ms·
There hasn't been another review cycle, but my expectation is that it will be proposed for merging again this time around. Should be interesting to watch...
by corbet 11y ago
There hasn't been another review cycle, but my expectation is that it will be proposed for merging again this time around. Should be interesting to watch...
- anon4 11y agoGiven that kdbus support was merged[1] in mainline systemd, I feel the situation is one of "I see you're not merging my friend's patches... would be a shame if the only remaining implementation of init would support only slow-dbus or kdbus..." [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-June/033170.html http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-Jun...
- comex 11y agosystemd has been using slow-dbus, via libdbus, for who knows how long. Now it will use slow-dbus via sd-bus. Hard to imagine how that could possibly amount to a threat.
- vezzy-fnord 11y agoThey've actually been using sd-bus for about two years now. What's new is that kdbus support is now build-time mandatory.