3 ms·

I don't get the complaint here. Are you saying that it wasn't amateurish? That somehow holding the president responsible for his branch of government is loaded

by blfr 11y ago

I don't get the complaint here. Are you saying that it wasn't amateurish? That somehow holding the president responsible for his branch of government is loaded? That most members here (at least most Americans) didn't support Obama? Funnily enough, you call voices critical of Obama in a similar fashion to grandparent "propaganda" pretending like there's no debate to be had around this and no opposing positions involved, and not arguing in defense of this. You pretend like there's no debate of the subject and lead us to agree with you. Does this kind of pandering-to-a-position have a name?

ajkjk 11y ago
Er, ok, that was cute and obnoxious. I'm not arguing the point at all. I don't know if it was amateurish. I don't have enough context to say. I think the phrasing of the post is loaded in a counterproductive and mind-killing way. I think the phrasing sounds like propaganda, regardless of who it criticizes. I have no interest in arguing politics. I just want to condemn writing like that.