3 ms·
This "leak" seems to be a way to hit at Kaspersky. It seems like Western governments are really out to get them eh? It's like these bozos aren't in our pocket s
by x5n1 11y ago
This "leak" seems to be a way to hit at Kaspersky. It seems like Western governments are really out to get them eh? It's like these bozos aren't in our pocket so let's try to destroy their credibility in hopes that companies will switch to Western companies for their security products whom we can then control using security letters etc.
- raverbashing 11y agoStill more reliable than Norton Anti Virus
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- briandear 11y agoYou might want to look carefully at the history of Kapersky before you cast them into a white knight role. Would you blindly trust a company with known KGB and FSB ties?
- x5n1 11y agoNo one's a saint, everyone's a sinner. We're casting the spotlight a certain way. I am sure it works equally well the other way. The point being there should be choice, not unilateralism like the Five Eyes want. It's all business, and never nothing personal. If you don't want Russia to have your secrets because they have something to gain, then by all means avoid the Russians. But it's for sure the case that Americans and the British will take your secrets and give them to their own industries for competitive advantage... while wagging their finger at everyone else for doing the same.