Well in fact constructors aren't that much like static methods at all. Now static methods really are a weird thing, because they break the block structure of th

Well in fact constructors aren't that much like static methods at all. Now static methods really are a weird thing, because they break the block structure of the language: they look like they have access to members of the class, but they don't. That's why Ceylon doesn't have static methods. Constructors, OTOH, actually fit in with the block structure of the language. They do have access to the members of the class, and the responsibility to initialize those members. Now, the interesting thing is that I spend 4 years of my life hoping that we would not need constructors, and that the ability to initialize a class via the parameter list of the class would be sufficient for all usecases. Sadly, it turns out that I was wrong about this, and that, in practice, there are some really good usecases for constructors in a language which emphasizes immutability as Ceylon does. That's just what we ran into in practice. > you said you didn't look into that other language I never said that. Please don't put words into my mouth. FYI, I've looked closely at lots of other languages, including languages like OCaml and F# and Rust which do things quite differently to Ceylon. I like those approaches, and they have advantages/disadvantages compared to constructors. I would not say they are clearly better, nor clearly worse. But I'm confident that what we have done is very clean and elegant and powerful in the context of Ceylon.