4 ms·
> think about how many people would have to be "in it" to make it work TS, her lawyer, some top guys in Apple and their marketing division? It could very reali
by chinhodado 11y ago
> think about how many people would have to be "in it" to make it work
TS, her lawyer, some top guys in Apple and their marketing division? It could very realistically be less than 5 people.
I don't say I support the theory, just want to point out that it doesn't take much to write an open letter and then respond to it on Twitter.
- _asummers 11y agoDoes TS really have to know? I think her outrage would be more believable if she didn't.
- sangnoir 11y agoHow sure are you the outrage is 'hers' in the first place if it was in written form on a blog? Believe me, her tirade was edited, vetted and revised by multiple parties six ways to Sunday. It matters very little if the original author was TS herself.
- protomyth 11y agoAnd your proof of that is?
- sangnoir 11y agoNo proof. This is the role of artist management companies. Taylor Swift has her own management company. All this gs being equal they managed her post. I could similarly claim "OS X El Capitan is being QA tested six ways to Sunday" without being in Cupertino. You could ask me for proof and I would have none.
- obstinate 11y ago> Believe me From what authority do you speak on this topic?
- sangnoir 11y agono authority whatsoever. My statement is unfalsifiable unless TS/her team steps fprward.I admit it's all conjecture, but I should note that TS had a publicist handling her public relation for 7 years before moving that function in-house to her management company. TS has so far given me the impression of being business savvy and if I'm charitable to assume competence of her management company, I'd assume she would shy from legal minefields Given the above priors, my estimation is that her lateat blog-post (like all others) was vetted by publicist(s) & legal advisor(s). YMMV.