4 ms·
It was probably to catch the reader's eye - 500 proxies wouldn't have jumped out quite as much (to me, at least). Also, had they omitted the number altogether,
by notduncansmith 11y ago
It was probably to catch the reader's eye - 500 proxies wouldn't have jumped out quite as much (to me, at least). Also, had they omitted the number altogether, the headline would be making a much more radical (and possibly incorrect) claim.
- geek_at 11y agoto be honest it was a coincidence. I was pasting IPs from random proxy lists on the web and this was the number I found. I just wanted to have more than 400 proxies to test