> I would expect absolutely no change at all. If you're able to ignore science, then why believe that a robot is actually on Mars anyway. You don't need to go

> I would expect absolutely no change at all. If you're able to ignore science, then why believe that a robot is actually on Mars anyway. You don't need to go that far. I don't think many creationists question whether we have a robot on Mars, or many other scientific claims that don't involve the distant past. I see no reason why extraterrestrial life has any incompatibilities with creationism, apart from the already-existing incompatibilities between scientific consensus and creationism (namely, the age of the Earth and evolution by natural selection).