3 ms·

I would expect absolutely no change at all. If you're able to ignore science, then why believe that a robot is actually on Mars anyway. Why believe that the m

by keedot 11y ago

I would expect absolutely no change at all. If you're able to ignore science, then why believe that a robot is actually on Mars anyway. Why believe that the magic box that you connect to the computer exists at all. If you're going to ignore science, then why would you try to rationalize at all. It's not like we put the smart kids in computers, engineering, physics, maths, chemistry, and physics; but then put the 'special' kids in paleontology. To believe a book over hard science because you were told to demonstrates a lack of critical thinking and a propensity to self delusion. I would expect a headline in a Christian blog to be "Scientists fake Mars life" or some other such nonsense.

baddox 11y ago
> I would expect absolutely no change at all. If you're able to ignore science, then why believe that a robot is actually on Mars anyway. You don't need to go that far. I don't think many creationists question whether we have a robot on Mars, or many other scientific claims that don't involve the distant past. I see no reason why extraterrestrial life has any incompatibilities with creationism, apart from the already-existing incompatibilities between scientific consensus and creationism (namely, the age of the Earth and evolution by natural selection).
- mikeash 11y ago
  God created life on Mars for Reasons. Seems like a pretty simple thing to reconcile.