8 ms·

Fun with Magic

63 points by bkudria 11y ago

deleted_account 11y ago
"Also can you look into getting a helicopter from new haven to jfk" Concierge service for rich people.
- guncheck 11y ago
  I thought the guy was trolling.. until they actually got him a helicopter.
  - schoen 11y ago
    I wonder how the people handling the requests deal with the issue of whether inquiries are real or jokes (if customers ask for something extremely unusual or extremely expensive).
    - tomhoward 11y ago
      You have to hook up your credit card and pay for things as they're ordered and before they're delivered. So the only real risk is the someone uses a stolen credit card when they first sign up. Between some sensible prudence on Magic's part (limit transaction size for new users) and the banks' own fraud detection systems, the risk seems quite manageable.
      - schoen 11y ago
        I guess I'm also wondering whether they have to worry about offending or angering the user by misjudging whether the user is joking -- not just about the financial risk to the company.
        kaybe 11y ago
        That would be like joking in the restaurant when you tell them to get you the lobster and champagne. Why would you do that?
mhuffman 11y ago
That was the longest humblebrag I ever read! Still, I'm impressed the the comprehensive coverage of Magic.
- deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
- FrankenPC 11y ago
  Speaking purely to the professionalism and responsiveness of Magic, yes it's pretty impressive.
M4v3R 11y ago
That was seriously cool. Many tech companies could learn much from them in terms of customer support. I understand that for these guys this is the product, but still, if you have awesome customer support, it will get you more business.
bshimmin 11y ago
If you liked the general theme of this, you might also enjoy: http://fourhourworkweek.com/2010/05/01/credit-card-concierge/ http://fourhourworkweek.com/2010/05/01/credit-card-concierge...
- dikaiosune 11y ago
  Much better! Mostly because it wasn't simultaneously rubbing my face in the economic gap between myself and the author.
vonklaus 11y ago
I don't really understand why magic is that innovative. If you are a guy like Justin Kan you can pay(already have) an assistant to do all of these things for you with a higher degree of accountability and a lower threshold of friction. It was fun wading through Kan's experience spending an average Americans salary simply to test drive a new iphone app, and that illustrates why magic probably won't appeal to the average American.
- alooPotato 11y ago
  You don't have to pay the high fixed cost of hiring someone fulltime or even part time. Anyone can pay for single use assistant service. Making that work though is hard.
  - vonklaus 11y ago
    Sure, I think magic is pretty cool. It is just a rather obvious startup idea and exists in various forms already. I don't think it can work for a few reasons: 1. There are already great sites like amazon, instacart, uber, lyft, eat24, doordash etc. They all have specialties and there is very little friction to use them, therefore there is very little value-add for most mundane things. 2. > It's completely free to chat with Magic. When you order something, we'll let you know the total price so you can confirm it before you are billed. There are no hidden fees, and tip is included. There could be a large amount of inquiries that do not result in purchase, however a real person will be looped in. Initially people will troll them or experiment and this will cost money for the company even when no purchase is made. 3. Doordash, Uber etc have the infrastructure to do this idea, do it better and achieve synergy. There are virtually no barriers to enter this space 4. Like many things in the sharing/on-demand economy margins are thin. 5. Naming your company Magic was stupid. Besides Magic the gathering, this word is way to generic. They are not at the top on SEO and I am sure there are many apps with variations of Magic in the app store. 6. Appeal. They need a lot of customers using the app a lot. I think many people in SV and NYC who are upper-middle - upperclass may use this app, but as I said before they will compete indirectly with many substitute products. Things competing with Magic 1. Saving money calling a service directly. 2. Other concierges a person has for free such as with major credit cards, hotels, or through their professional affiliations. Many premium CC come with these. 3. Anyone who already has an assistant or employee that works for them directly. 4. Other companies invading the space (mentioned above)
birken 11y ago
I don't think these particular examples are that exciting. Rich people can already get this type of concierge service from existing places, like a personal assistant, virtual personal assistant [1], or a credit card concierge (you probably have one [2]). If you are spending enough money, getting somebody to help you isn't hard. I still don't understand how the service would apply to the average person, or how it could apply enough to make lots of money. Average people really try to be efficient with their money, and don't pay money for that many things they can do themselves. With annoying tasks like laundry, there are economies of scale so you can actually provide consumers with better service for less money, which is a win/win. But with a concierge, you are always going to have to pay the concierge money, and will they really be able to provide enough expertise to be worth it? I'm skeptical. 1: https://www.zirtual.com/ https://www.zirtual.com/ 2: http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/putting-concierge-service-to-test-1433.php http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/putting-concierg...
- Swizec 11y ago
  As a person who grew up poor-ish [1] but is now reasonably well off [2], I have developed a little theory on why the market of make-your-life-slightly-easier-by-hiring-a-human-through-an-app services is booming so much right now. Everything from Uber to Washio, Handy, and Task Rabbit falls into this market for the purposes of my theory. We are lazy. Very lazy. We think we're busy, and to an extent we are. We've been brought up by frugal parents.[3] As a result, we don't know how to get things done for us. We feel bad hiring somebody to do something for us. We don't know how to handle the idea that we can afford to have people working for us. Using an app makes this easier. It reduces the emotional impact of it all. You're just using an app after all, you're paying a company to hire a person to do something. You're offloading your bad feelings onto a company. To top it off, we don't even know where to get someone to do things for us. We didn't grow up with an infrastructure of hired help, we grew up with an infrastructure and worldview of working for others. The idea of having people work for us is fundamentally alien. Apps help. [1] low middle class single parent kind of poor where you'd rather spend two days painting your own apartment poorly than pay a professional to do it. And by poorly I mean, have your high school age son do it (me). [2] software engineer in San Francisco [3] either because we used to be poor, or because we weren't the rich kind of middle class (here I'm making the distinction that upper class are people who don't need cashflow to support their lifestyle)
peterjancelis 11y ago
Great article but begs the question, how much is a helicopter ride for 4 from New Haven to JFK?
- vonklaus 11y ago
  Around $2,460, at least[0]. Also, I suspect you pay for fuel and time although I have never rented a helicopter. There is also a fee from Magic for booking through them. [0]http://www.newyorkhelicopter.com/charters/charter-rates/ http://www.newyorkhelicopter.com/charters/charter-rates/ edit: > All additional expenses will be passed on at cost landings, parking, late operations, overnight expenses or other charges directly incidental to the flight requested. > Charter prices are one-way and don’t include Landing Fees from the Manhattan Heliports. A fee for landing at JFK was likely levied.
- markdown 11y ago
  > raises the question FTFY
  - phaemon 11y ago
    Outside of the Internet, every single time I have every seen "begs the question" used, it means "raises the question". TV, newspapers, magazines, radio, common speech. Every single time. Therefore, that's what the phrase means. I have no idea where this American obsession with tying it to a technical term for a fallacy comes from, but I wish it would stop. It's as though every time someone referred to a ram, whether a male sheep or a battering ram, they were informed that "RAM means Random Access Memory. You're using it wrong."
    - joshuapants 11y ago
      Language prescriptivism is hardly an American innovation
    - schoen 11y ago
      Since the sense referring to the fallacy is the original one and the non-fallacy sense is the innovation, your analogy about "ram" isn't ideal.
badusername 11y ago
Meh. That's a lot of input that the author had to provide. It is responding to unstructured/unpredictable messages as well, which takes quite a bit of thinking by the author. If I had to change a flight, I would guess I could do it faster on Virgin's website rather than through Magic. Same with the helicopter.
- joshvm 11y ago
  The flight change was done via Magic because he couldn't use their website on his mobile. Still, you'd think it would be easier to call up a friend.
  - mikeash 11y ago
    Why not call the airline?
tylerlh 11y ago
I used Magic to have them find me a moving company that could move me from Mountain View to Palo Alto the next day and they delivered pretty much flawlessly. The movers they found me were skilled, cheaper, and available immediately as opposed to the ones I found myself. All in all, I was pretty impressed with the experience.
benchmark6 11y ago
These are the worst examples to demonstrate a service meant for average people. Magic booked my helicopter ride! Magic found and bought me a Ducati! Also look how much back and forth was involved. All of this seems easier doing it yourself.
- Thriptic 11y ago
  I thought these were great examples. He demonstrated that he was able to solve reasonably challenging, atypical problems with Magic, and that the service brought a lot of value to the table by being thoughtful (knowing to provide KBB reference values without having to be asked, being able to negotiate prices down on behalf of the buyer, having paperwork sent over by a driver etc). It's true that a lot of back and forth was involved, but they facilitated a process which would have taken days of effort on behalf of the buyer (buying the bike) via a few text messages. I personally was both highly amused and very impressed.
jkimmel 11y ago
I think Magic could be great as a lower-price-finder for people with a more normal income. ie. "I found a rental car for $PRICE at SFO tomorrow. Can you find me anything cheaper?" If Magic finds you a better deal even with their cut (they work their fee into the price they quote you), they get paid & you still save money.
gkoberger 11y ago
So, Justin Kan has done well for himself financially, and used Magic for a bit of fun. But don't write Magic off as just a concierge for the rich. Things in the past month I've used Magic for: * Was in a city without Uber; Magic called a taxi to my location (and took care of payment) * Got my car re-keyed with a locksmith * Called a few restaurants/bars to try to find my lost wallet * Called my doctor's office to figure out what the best insurance for me to get was. * Delivered custom-drilled 2x4s at 9pm within an hour * Removed a bunch of garbage (since we moved and had lots of boxes) * Delivered an Apple Express within an hour * I said "find me a nice restaurant within half a mile for 3 people available in the next hour", and they found and made me a reservation. * Checked what time my parking garage closed (the hours weren't listed online) * Called my upcoming hotel and arranged for a package to be delivered to my room. There's a bunch more I've had them do. It's been amazing for things that aren't hard, but that I don't have time for. I'm still trying to figure out what to use Magic for, but every time I do, it really is magical.
- birken 11y ago
  How much are you paying though? The service is undoubtably being heavily subsidized by VC money. This is the classic silicon valley model, a model I love, but there has to be a light at the end of the tunnel. As noted in the OP, this also reminds me a lot of Exec, and Exec didn't work. In the post-mortem, JK makes a very interesting point: > if a job request came in and there were no Execs available to run them ... we sent someone from the office to run the jobs ourselves. Unfortunately, this gave us a false sense that the quality of service for our customers was better than it was, as the average competence of our employees was higher than our average recruitable errand runners. [1] This is a critical problem that any service business like Magic will run into. Training and quality becomes much harder at scale, and the more you have to pay for "Magicians", the more you have to charge. And if it costs too much money, it isn't "Magical" anymore. Yes, they have advantages over Exec because they can arbitrage less expensive labor overseas, but quality at an efficient price is still going to be a huge issue. 1: http://justinkan.com/exec-errands-post-mortem http://justinkan.com/exec-errands-post-mortem
  - gkoberger 11y ago
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]
jenius 11y ago
Read the beginning of the article, was mildly interested. Kept reading about how he arbitrarily decided to book a helicopter ride and buy an expensive motorcycle through a texting service just to test it out, and was no longer sure if it was honestly a troll or not. Came here to see the comments, apparently was not a troll. Wow. So the question I have here is, was he aware of how outrageously douchey this article comes off with the examples being off the cuff entirely over-the-top money blowing that he apparently regularly indulges in, or are rich people so in their own world that they don't even realize how normal people live and that writing something like this comes off as absurd to most people? And another question that comes to mind too. He tried to make a startup that solved a similar problem a while ago, and mentioned this in the article. Are rich people seeking further conveniences for their already rather convenient lives entirely blind to the range of problems middle or lower class people deal with? Do they not care about these types of people and their problems because it simply not relevant to them? I know this sounds very accusing of rich people, and while I am always personally a little shocked to see money squandered carelessly while so much suffering happens in the world, I honestly do not have anything against these people at all. Everyone has their own path in life and can and should make their own choices as they see fit. I am just honestly curious how it is rationalized, and the thought process surrounding it for people like this. Edit: Did some googling and turned up these two quora answers: - http://www.quora.com/Do-rich-people-feel-bad-or-guilty-when-others-find-out-they-spend-a-lot-of-money-on-something-that-people-with-less-money-might-consider-excessive-or-couldnt-afford http://www.quora.com/Do-rich-people-feel-bad-or-guilty-when-... - http://www.quora.com/How-do-rich-people-feel-about-the-fact-that-many-people-live-in-extreme-poverty-while-they-spend-large-sums-of-money-on-luxuries http://www.quora.com/How-do-rich-people-feel-about-the-fact-... The answers given are essentially "they make excuses for themselves and set up situations that rationalize it, such as 'I deserve this' and 'I could never make enough of a difference', etc." I don't quite feel satisfied with this. I would like to hear an answer from a legitimately very rich person still just out of curiosity!
- oldmoney 11y ago
  I do not know Justin and I can't speak for him, but it seems to me that he has earned every penny that he has. > So the question I have here is, was he aware of how outrageously douchey this article comes off with the examples being off the cuff entirely over-the-top money blowing that he apparently regularly indulges in, or are rich people so in their own world that they don't even realize how normal people live and that writing something like this comes off as absurd to most people? Your comment is more absurd than his spending habits. You are suggesting that he should be socially restrained in one form or the other from spending his hard earned money. From exercising his financial freedom (yes, the ability to spend money without worry is a hard won freedom) because of your own perceptions of class narratives. To apply your logic to you, do you sacrifice 100% of your disposable income because some children somewhere are starving? Do you go out? Do you drink when you go out? Do you believe that those dollars couldn't save the life of someone dying from AIDS in a developing country? If yes, then why don't you work to give away every single penny you have to that cause? Why do you buy that beer and by doing so condemn that person to death? Clearly you can see the fallacy over here. Not only are these problems something that can't be solved by throwing money at them - people have tried and failed at that, but there isn't a fixed pie or some upper limit of the gross value that can exist in this world. That Harley he bought paid for engine research in one form and the creation of a supply chain that could be used to build engines that can be adapted to the conditions of rural Zimbabwe. However, beyond those fallacies lies the idea of freedom I initially talked about. It is important for us to make our own choices. In other words, what Justin does or does not do to solve broader social problems is his and his decision alone. He pays his taxes. You pay yours. What he does or he doesn't do with his dimes is quite simply none of your business.
manigandham 11y ago
Lots of undue whining in these comments... they can do plain boring stuff too, and a lot of the tasks are free from what I see if there's no purchase involved. Even purchases seem to be a low margin so it might be worth it if you're short on time/effort. Instead of just proclaiming the future demise of the company why not actually try it out? I'm sure there are plenty of average people getting value out of it. Besides there are also several companies that are successful catering just to the rich. The only way we'll know if this company will work out is by using it and seeing what happens. And if they indeed are unsustainable, might as well get the free help while it's available.

Fun with Magic

63 points by bkudria 11y ago

deleted_account 11y ago

"Also can you look into getting a helicopter from new haven to jfk" Concierge service for rich people.

guncheck 11y ago
I thought the guy was trolling.. until they actually got him a helicopter.
- schoen 11y ago
  I wonder how the people handling the requests deal with the issue of whether inquiries are real or jokes (if customers ask for something extremely unusual or extremely expensive).
  - tomhoward 11y ago
    You have to hook up your credit card and pay for things as they're ordered and before they're delivered. So the only real risk is the someone uses a stolen credit card when they first sign up. Between some sensible prudence on Magic's part (limit transaction size for new users) and the banks' own fraud detection systems, the risk seems quite manageable.
    - schoen 11y ago
      I guess I'm also wondering whether they have to worry about offending or angering the user by misjudging whether the user is joking -- not just about the financial risk to the company.
      - kaybe 11y ago
        That would be like joking in the restaurant when you tell them to get you the lobster and champagne. Why would you do that?

mhuffman 11y ago

That was the longest humblebrag I ever read! Still, I'm impressed the the comprehensive coverage of Magic.

deleted 11y ago
[deleted]
FrankenPC 11y ago
Speaking purely to the professionalism and responsiveness of Magic, yes it's pretty impressive.

M4v3R 11y ago

That was seriously cool. Many tech companies could learn much from them in terms of customer support. I understand that for these guys this is the product, but still, if you have awesome customer support, it will get you more business.

bshimmin 11y ago

If you liked the general theme of this, you might also enjoy: http://fourhourworkweek.com/2010/05/01/credit-card-concierge/ http://fourhourworkweek.com/2010/05/01/credit-card-concierge...

dikaiosune 11y ago
Much better! Mostly because it wasn't simultaneously rubbing my face in the economic gap between myself and the author.

vonklaus 11y ago

I don't really understand why magic is that innovative. If you are a guy like Justin Kan you can pay(already have) an assistant to do all of these things for you with a higher degree of accountability and a lower threshold of friction. It was fun wading through Kan's experience spending an average Americans salary simply to test drive a new iphone app, and that illustrates why magic probably won't appeal to the average American.

alooPotato 11y ago
You don't have to pay the high fixed cost of hiring someone fulltime or even part time. Anyone can pay for single use assistant service. Making that work though is hard.
- vonklaus 11y ago
  Sure, I think magic is pretty cool. It is just a rather obvious startup idea and exists in various forms already. I don't think it can work for a few reasons: 1. There are already great sites like amazon, instacart, uber, lyft, eat24, doordash etc. They all have specialties and there is very little friction to use them, therefore there is very little value-add for most mundane things. 2. > It's completely free to chat with Magic. When you order something, we'll let you know the total price so you can confirm it before you are billed. There are no hidden fees, and tip is included. There could be a large amount of inquiries that do not result in purchase, however a real person will be looped in. Initially people will troll them or experiment and this will cost money for the company even when no purchase is made. 3. Doordash, Uber etc have the infrastructure to do this idea, do it better and achieve synergy. There are virtually no barriers to enter this space 4. Like many things in the sharing/on-demand economy margins are thin. 5. Naming your company Magic was stupid. Besides Magic the gathering, this word is way to generic. They are not at the top on SEO and I am sure there are many apps with variations of Magic in the app store. 6. Appeal. They need a lot of customers using the app a lot. I think many people in SV and NYC who are upper-middle - upperclass may use this app, but as I said before they will compete indirectly with many substitute products. Things competing with Magic 1. Saving money calling a service directly. 2. Other concierges a person has for free such as with major credit cards, hotels, or through their professional affiliations. Many premium CC come with these. 3. Anyone who already has an assistant or employee that works for them directly. 4. Other companies invading the space (mentioned above)

birken 11y ago

I don't think these particular examples are that exciting. Rich people can already get this type of concierge service from existing places, like a personal assistant, virtual personal assistant [1], or a credit card concierge (you probably have one [2]). If you are spending enough money, getting somebody to help you isn't hard. I still don't understand how the service would apply to the average person, or how it could apply enough to make lots of money. Average people really try to be efficient with their money, and don't pay money for that many things they can do themselves. With annoying tasks like laundry, there are economies of scale so you can actually provide consumers with better service for less money, which is a win/win. But with a concierge, you are always going to have to pay the concierge money, and will they really be able to provide enough expertise to be worth it? I'm skeptical. 1: https://www.zirtual.com/ https://www.zirtual.com/ 2: http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/putting-concierge-service-to-test-1433.php http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/putting-concierg...

Swizec 11y ago
As a person who grew up poor-ish [1] but is now reasonably well off [2], I have developed a little theory on why the market of make-your-life-slightly-easier-by-hiring-a-human-through-an-app services is booming so much right now. Everything from Uber to Washio, Handy, and Task Rabbit falls into this market for the purposes of my theory. We are lazy. Very lazy. We think we're busy, and to an extent we are. We've been brought up by frugal parents.[3] As a result, we don't know how to get things done for us. We feel bad hiring somebody to do something for us. We don't know how to handle the idea that we can afford to have people working for us. Using an app makes this easier. It reduces the emotional impact of it all. You're just using an app after all, you're paying a company to hire a person to do something. You're offloading your bad feelings onto a company. To top it off, we don't even know where to get someone to do things for us. We didn't grow up with an infrastructure of hired help, we grew up with an infrastructure and worldview of working for others. The idea of having people work for us is fundamentally alien. Apps help. [1] low middle class single parent kind of poor where you'd rather spend two days painting your own apartment poorly than pay a professional to do it. And by poorly I mean, have your high school age son do it (me). [2] software engineer in San Francisco [3] either because we used to be poor, or because we weren't the rich kind of middle class (here I'm making the distinction that upper class are people who don't need cashflow to support their lifestyle)

peterjancelis 11y ago

Great article but begs the question, how much is a helicopter ride for 4 from New Haven to JFK?

vonklaus 11y ago
Around $2,460, at least[0]. Also, I suspect you pay for fuel and time although I have never rented a helicopter. There is also a fee from Magic for booking through them. [0]http://www.newyorkhelicopter.com/charters/charter-rates/ http://www.newyorkhelicopter.com/charters/charter-rates/ edit: > All additional expenses will be passed on at cost landings, parking, late operations, overnight expenses or other charges directly incidental to the flight requested. > Charter prices are one-way and don’t include Landing Fees from the Manhattan Heliports. A fee for landing at JFK was likely levied.
markdown 11y ago
> raises the question FTFY
- phaemon 11y ago
  Outside of the Internet, every single time I have every seen "begs the question" used, it means "raises the question". TV, newspapers, magazines, radio, common speech. Every single time. Therefore, that's what the phrase means. I have no idea where this American obsession with tying it to a technical term for a fallacy comes from, but I wish it would stop. It's as though every time someone referred to a ram, whether a male sheep or a battering ram, they were informed that "RAM means Random Access Memory. You're using it wrong."
  - joshuapants 11y ago
    Language prescriptivism is hardly an American innovation
  - schoen 11y ago
    Since the sense referring to the fallacy is the original one and the non-fallacy sense is the innovation, your analogy about "ram" isn't ideal.

badusername 11y ago

Meh. That's a lot of input that the author had to provide. It is responding to unstructured/unpredictable messages as well, which takes quite a bit of thinking by the author. If I had to change a flight, I would guess I could do it faster on Virgin's website rather than through Magic. Same with the helicopter.

joshvm 11y ago
The flight change was done via Magic because he couldn't use their website on his mobile. Still, you'd think it would be easier to call up a friend.
- mikeash 11y ago
  Why not call the airline?

tylerlh 11y ago

I used Magic to have them find me a moving company that could move me from Mountain View to Palo Alto the next day and they delivered pretty much flawlessly. The movers they found me were skilled, cheaper, and available immediately as opposed to the ones I found myself. All in all, I was pretty impressed with the experience.

benchmark6 11y ago

These are the worst examples to demonstrate a service meant for average people. Magic booked my helicopter ride! Magic found and bought me a Ducati! Also look how much back and forth was involved. All of this seems easier doing it yourself.

Thriptic 11y ago
I thought these were great examples. He demonstrated that he was able to solve reasonably challenging, atypical problems with Magic, and that the service brought a lot of value to the table by being thoughtful (knowing to provide KBB reference values without having to be asked, being able to negotiate prices down on behalf of the buyer, having paperwork sent over by a driver etc). It's true that a lot of back and forth was involved, but they facilitated a process which would have taken days of effort on behalf of the buyer (buying the bike) via a few text messages. I personally was both highly amused and very impressed.

jkimmel 11y ago

I think Magic could be great as a lower-price-finder for people with a more normal income. ie. "I found a rental car for $PRICE at SFO tomorrow. Can you find me anything cheaper?" If Magic finds you a better deal even with their cut (they work their fee into the price they quote you), they get paid & you still save money.

gkoberger 11y ago

So, Justin Kan has done well for himself financially, and used Magic for a bit of fun. But don't write Magic off as just a concierge for the rich. Things in the past month I've used Magic for: * Was in a city without Uber; Magic called a taxi to my location (and took care of payment) * Got my car re-keyed with a locksmith * Called a few restaurants/bars to try to find my lost wallet * Called my doctor's office to figure out what the best insurance for me to get was. * Delivered custom-drilled 2x4s at 9pm within an hour * Removed a bunch of garbage (since we moved and had lots of boxes) * Delivered an Apple Express within an hour * I said "find me a nice restaurant within half a mile for 3 people available in the next hour", and they found and made me a reservation. * Checked what time my parking garage closed (the hours weren't listed online) * Called my upcoming hotel and arranged for a package to be delivered to my room. There's a bunch more I've had them do. It's been amazing for things that aren't hard, but that I don't have time for. I'm still trying to figure out what to use Magic for, but every time I do, it really is magical.

birken 11y ago
How much are you paying though? The service is undoubtably being heavily subsidized by VC money. This is the classic silicon valley model, a model I love, but there has to be a light at the end of the tunnel. As noted in the OP, this also reminds me a lot of Exec, and Exec didn't work. In the post-mortem, JK makes a very interesting point: > if a job request came in and there were no Execs available to run them ... we sent someone from the office to run the jobs ourselves. Unfortunately, this gave us a false sense that the quality of service for our customers was better than it was, as the average competence of our employees was higher than our average recruitable errand runners. [1] This is a critical problem that any service business like Magic will run into. Training and quality becomes much harder at scale, and the more you have to pay for "Magicians", the more you have to charge. And if it costs too much money, it isn't "Magical" anymore. Yes, they have advantages over Exec because they can arbitrage less expensive labor overseas, but quality at an efficient price is still going to be a huge issue. 1: http://justinkan.com/exec-errands-post-mortem http://justinkan.com/exec-errands-post-mortem
- gkoberger 11y ago

deleted 11y ago

[deleted]

jenius 11y ago

Read the beginning of the article, was mildly interested. Kept reading about how he arbitrarily decided to book a helicopter ride and buy an expensive motorcycle through a texting service just to test it out, and was no longer sure if it was honestly a troll or not. Came here to see the comments, apparently was not a troll. Wow. So the question I have here is, was he aware of how outrageously douchey this article comes off with the examples being off the cuff entirely over-the-top money blowing that he apparently regularly indulges in, or are rich people so in their own world that they don't even realize how normal people live and that writing something like this comes off as absurd to most people? And another question that comes to mind too. He tried to make a startup that solved a similar problem a while ago, and mentioned this in the article. Are rich people seeking further conveniences for their already rather convenient lives entirely blind to the range of problems middle or lower class people deal with? Do they not care about these types of people and their problems because it simply not relevant to them? I know this sounds very accusing of rich people, and while I am always personally a little shocked to see money squandered carelessly while so much suffering happens in the world, I honestly do not have anything against these people at all. Everyone has their own path in life and can and should make their own choices as they see fit. I am just honestly curious how it is rationalized, and the thought process surrounding it for people like this. Edit: Did some googling and turned up these two quora answers: - http://www.quora.com/Do-rich-people-feel-bad-or-guilty-when-others-find-out-they-spend-a-lot-of-money-on-something-that-people-with-less-money-might-consider-excessive-or-couldnt-afford http://www.quora.com/Do-rich-people-feel-bad-or-guilty-when-... - http://www.quora.com/How-do-rich-people-feel-about-the-fact-that-many-people-live-in-extreme-poverty-while-they-spend-large-sums-of-money-on-luxuries http://www.quora.com/How-do-rich-people-feel-about-the-fact-... The answers given are essentially "they make excuses for themselves and set up situations that rationalize it, such as 'I deserve this' and 'I could never make enough of a difference', etc." I don't quite feel satisfied with this. I would like to hear an answer from a legitimately very rich person still just out of curiosity!

oldmoney 11y ago
I do not know Justin and I can't speak for him, but it seems to me that he has earned every penny that he has. > So the question I have here is, was he aware of how outrageously douchey this article comes off with the examples being off the cuff entirely over-the-top money blowing that he apparently regularly indulges in, or are rich people so in their own world that they don't even realize how normal people live and that writing something like this comes off as absurd to most people? Your comment is more absurd than his spending habits. You are suggesting that he should be socially restrained in one form or the other from spending his hard earned money. From exercising his financial freedom (yes, the ability to spend money without worry is a hard won freedom) because of your own perceptions of class narratives. To apply your logic to you, do you sacrifice 100% of your disposable income because some children somewhere are starving? Do you go out? Do you drink when you go out? Do you believe that those dollars couldn't save the life of someone dying from AIDS in a developing country? If yes, then why don't you work to give away every single penny you have to that cause? Why do you buy that beer and by doing so condemn that person to death? Clearly you can see the fallacy over here. Not only are these problems something that can't be solved by throwing money at them - people have tried and failed at that, but there isn't a fixed pie or some upper limit of the gross value that can exist in this world. That Harley he bought paid for engine research in one form and the creation of a supply chain that could be used to build engines that can be adapted to the conditions of rural Zimbabwe. However, beyond those fallacies lies the idea of freedom I initially talked about. It is important for us to make our own choices. In other words, what Justin does or does not do to solve broader social problems is his and his decision alone. He pays his taxes. You pay yours. What he does or he doesn't do with his dimes is quite simply none of your business.

manigandham 11y ago

Lots of undue whining in these comments... they can do plain boring stuff too, and a lot of the tasks are free from what I see if there's no purchase involved. Even purchases seem to be a low margin so it might be worth it if you're short on time/effort. Instead of just proclaiming the future demise of the company why not actually try it out? I'm sure there are plenty of average people getting value out of it. Besides there are also several companies that are successful catering just to the rich. The only way we'll know if this company will work out is by using it and seeing what happens. And if they indeed are unsustainable, might as well get the free help while it's available.