> AGW is labeled a "denier". And rightly so, when the overwhelmingly vast consensus, among scientists, is that the thing exists. > I think that even AGW propo

> AGW is labeled a "denier". And rightly so, when the overwhelmingly vast consensus, among scientists, is that the thing exists. > I think that even AGW proponents know the science is not on their side Outlandish claims require proof. > they just don't care, because they want more government power over the economy. as do global conspiracy theories involving the implicit cooperation of the entire scientific community and multiple governments. > Demonizing a substance created by your very breath This is not relevant to the discussion, at all.