3 ms·
Could be. Still, the original letter appeared to come directly from a lawyer with an @imax.com email address, and she holds the title of Chief Administrative Of
by morganvachon 11y ago
Could be. Still, the original letter appeared to come directly from a lawyer with an @imax.com email address, and she holds the title of Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary:
http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ars-technica-letter.pdf http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ars-te...
- phonon 11y agoG. Mary Ruby's been there since 1987, and is a former General Counsel (amongst other things). https://www.imax.com/corporate/management/ https://www.imax.com/corporate/management/ So not an intern, that's for sure.
- vermontdevil 11y agoSure. It's sent on behalf of the CAO/Corporate Secretary. But come on - I doubt the GC spends time reading Ars Technica for violations of trademarks. This seems a classic mistake of a staff member without thinking the impact on company's PR.