Let's ignore the whole anthropogenic-or-not question. Are you saying you believe that global average temperatures aren't increasing? Or are you saying you bel

Let's ignore the whole anthropogenic-or-not question. Are you saying you believe that global average temperatures aren't increasing? Or are you saying you believe they are, but we shouldn't do anything about it and just live with whatever consequences come our way? Fundamentally I just don't understand your position. If you genuinely believe global average temperatures aren't rising, well, there's not much to argue about. The evidence is in. Even the skeptics generally accept climate change is occurring, even if they don't agree about why. Holding a position that's objectively contrary to all current evidence is a position of faith rather than reason. If you accept that climate change is occurring, but that humans aren't the cause, and your argument is we should simply do nothing because OMG GOVERNMENT, well, again, there's not much to argue about. That's a fundamentally faith-based position as well, as it argues that the death and displacement of billions is better than governments empowered to offset those effects. I can't begin to even fathom that claim. It requires a distrust of government that I can't begin to comprehend... which has its irony, given it was the government that created the very medium upon which we're having this discussion. I suppose the last option is that you're just a troll, but I'll be generous and assume that's not the case and that rational discourse is, in fact, possible.