4 ms·
Sigh. Yeah, sure. You want to do an analysis of newspaper headlines over the past 30 years? You think they will agree with you? Cause I know they won't. Als
by MCRed 11y ago
Sigh. Yeah, sure. You want to do an analysis of newspaper headlines over the past 30 years? You think they will agree with you? Cause I know they won't.
Also, calling people denier is proof positive of my point. The down vote brigades are just icing on the cake.
You guys don't care about science, you reject the scientific method completely, and you rely on propaganda, demonization and silencing your critics.
If the science was on your side, why the need for such dishonesty?
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- waterlesscloud 11y agoI think there was a shift in the term news people used, and I think it happened as the topic became more politicized. That's worth making note of, since it likely is a technique intended to shape opinion. Someone somewhere decided Climate Change was more marketable. But the news media isn't scientists, and from what I've found, they used Climate Change a long time ago, well before the media did.