3 ms·
"Prove they have spent that much on "propaganda" and that they have spent no more than 200k for research." The 200K went to Richard Muller at Berkeley. I chall
by ocschwar 11y ago
"Prove they have spent that much on "propaganda" and that they have spent no more than 200k for research."
The 200K went to Richard Muller at Berkeley. I challenge you to find any other money. As for the $100M, here's $80M from one source, (freres Koch). The remaining $20M takes a bit more googling.
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/polluterwatch/koch-industries/ http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/global-warming-an...
[update]
I love how I'm being challenged to prove a negative. If you can find any grant besides the Berkeley BEST grant, you will have disproved it. Go ahead and try.
And BTW, I have no downvotes. I've been "too fasted" myself.
- MCRed 11y agoNope, you made the claim. You need to back it up. Also, mister just-created-a-throwaway account, thanks for the down votes from you and your cronies. It says a lot more than anything you've provided on this thread.