4 ms·
He makes an excellent point in the beginning, to gain some trust, then follows the exact formula he describes.
by Justsignedup 11y ago
He makes an excellent point in the beginning, to gain some trust, then follows the exact formula he describes.
- johnchristopher 11y agoI can't tell if you are referring to parent's message or the article.
- tim333 11y agoI'm not sure which "exact same formula" you are referring to but my take was he agrees the possible outcomes cover a "huge range, from marginally beneficial to terrifyingly harmful, so it is hardly a consensus of danger, and if you look at the 'probability density functions' of climate sensitivity, they always cluster towards the lower end." And he opposes people who will only countenance an extreme position, either being alarmist or denying everything. He doesn't really seem to deviate much from that position throughout the article. I have a lot of sympathy for this - the probabilities density functions clustering towards the lower end isn't the most snappy of slogans but seems to be the truth unlike more extreme viewpoints.