3 ms·
Ugh dammit. Short version: Instead of taking the branch <feature> and rebasing it, make a branch called <feature>.1 on top of <feature>, then rebase that, leav
by Mithaldu 11y ago
Ugh dammit. Short version:
Instead of taking the branch <feature> and rebasing it, make a branch called <feature>.1 on top of <feature>, then rebase that, leaving <feature> in place.
That way all your references remain intact and you can compare CI results.
Increment the number as needed.
- sytse 11y agoIt solves the issue of the CI references. But it also seems a bit clumsy to me.
- Mithaldu 11y agoIt's all trade-offs. The trade-off being that you maintain history by having copies of a branch around, while the dude trying to fix a bug doesn't have to break out the vodka bottle upon arriving back home. :)