False dichotomy. Nobody is talking about forcing anybody to do this. At least not the OP, and I didn't read it that way. The conclusion of this issue is anythi

False dichotomy. Nobody is talking about forcing anybody to do this. At least not the OP, and I didn't read it that way. The conclusion of this issue is anything but obvious. It is hairy, ambiguous, and unclear. An alternative could be: public shaming, and people taking their money elsewhere. There, no government required. I feel he is allowed to at least express disapproval...