No, that's BS. The complaint letter was about an actual comparison to IMAX. This was obviously not an infringing use, and the letter is the sort of gross overre

No, that's BS. The complaint letter was about an actual comparison to IMAX. This was obviously not an infringing use, and the letter is the sort of gross overreach that erodes respect for trademark law as a whole. Just because you can philosophically conceive of a stretch by which an egregious abuse might possibly not be one, doesn't mean you're helping at all.