The point of the article was less on the supply side and more that the process itself has become more rigorous. That people put up with it might imply they coul

The point of the article was less on the supply side and more that the process itself has become more rigorous. That people put up with it might imply they could lower wages. EDIT: Can someone explain the negative votes? OP was right if the issue was: we can't find people, rather than: we're going to make the process even more rigorous and time consuming. Maybe increasing wages will draw more qualified applicants which will qualify for the tests faster?