4 ms·
The point, of course, isn't that they would think it was literally an IMAX. I'm not sure why you're arguing against that, frankly. But that consumers could thi
by waterlesscloud 11y ago
The point, of course, isn't that they would think it was literally an IMAX. I'm not sure why you're arguing against that, frankly.
But that consumers could think it was IMAX certified or some such. That sort of thing is worth defending.
- Bud 11y agoConsumers could also think it was certified by the Mayo Clinic and made of unicorns. This is approximately as likely. Making the leap from what was written in the article to "IMAX certified" is a hilariously wide leap. It's about two orders of magnitude too wide to justify the threat letter from IMAX.