Personally, I don't see any evidence that the charter was created in bad faith. It seems like an entirely reasonable set of guidelines that would be good to fo

Personally, I don't see any evidence that the charter was created in bad faith. It seems like an entirely reasonable set of guidelines that would be good to follow. As you say, it all hinges on 'representation'. That's why I asked for clarification on the charter GitHub project. Basically: how do the creators of the charter see this working, and how will they prevent it being used in ways you suggest, to suppress unpopular speech? There is so much anger on this topic it's remarkably hard to get a clear picture of what's going on.