3 ms·
I think what a lot of the posts on this thread are missing is that Beats is not really a headphone company, it's a jewelry company. And jewelry doesn't need to
by icanhackit 11y ago
I think what a lot of the posts on this thread are missing is that Beats is not really a headphone company, it's a jewelry company. And jewelry doesn't need to be made of anything special, it just needs to be rare [0]. The prohibitive cost of Beats is its selling point.
Nick Szabo's essay on money Shelling Out - The Origins of Money [1] points out how Wampum in its various forms was worn to signify wealth. Ornamental swords and axes with no utility were flashed around as well.
This is nothing new - what's interesting is that we're beginning to see consumer technology take the place of beads, fabrics, stones and metal.
[0] Using wampum as an example again – the materials themselves were common however energy was required to collect shells/teeth/furs etc – energy that could otherwise be used to collect food, repair huts, make clothing etc. Money abstracts this cost, but it's still there effectively
[1] http://szabo.best.vwh.net/shell.html http://szabo.best.vwh.net/shell.html
- chrischen 11y agoWell as the article points out, the beats didn't require much "energy" to produce either.
- alwaysinshade 11y agobeats didn't require much "energy" to produce I think the point is that the "energy" isn't what was required to make the product, it was the energy expended to acquire the it. Collecting shells means time spent not collecting food. Wearing the shells signifies a kind of wealth where you have an abundance of time and thus an abundance of resources. Spending hard earned money on shitty earphones is a similar kind of wealth.