4 ms·
Your point was to say you and your SO don't wear rings. Did you grow up under a rock? Have you never, ever interacted with people wearing wedding rings? If no
by irishcoffee 11y ago
Your point was to say you and your SO don't wear rings.
Did you grow up under a rock? Have you never, ever interacted with people wearing wedding rings?
If not, fine, fair enough. Judging from your comment history, this doesn't seem to be the case.
To answer your question, you can tell if something is "a thing" by comparing said "thing" to other known and accepted "like things." Does that not make sense?
- srean 11y agoDownvoted, because your comment adds little else other than bile.
- __z 11y ago> Your point was to say you and your SO don't wear rings. No it wasn't. It was asking what make a wedding ring identifiable as a wedding ring. It confuses me that someone can identify something as a wedding ring when it isn't being worn - I thought that wedding rings were any ring. I know that engagement rings usually have a diamond but I think other rings can have diamonds too? >Did you grow up under a rock? Have you never, ever interacted with people wearing wedding rings? Sure, but I don't pay much attention to other people's jewelry because that's just not something I care about. My parents didn't wear wedding rings or any other types of jewelry at all so I guess I did grow up under a rock. I don't think my aunts or uncles wore them either, or does my mother-in-law, - they just aren't "a thing" in my family so I'm out of the cultural loop. Its totally and completely out of my knowledge area. I like learning something new so I figured it was worth asking! Judging by the variety of comments it seems that there is a variety and the theft's "standards" didn't make sense.